postwarblue wrote:In Neill's day in the Army women were listed under sports gear.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderator: Moderators
postwarblue wrote:In Neill's day in the Army women were listed under sports gear.
anniexf wrote:postwarblue wrote:In Neill's day in the Army women were listed under sports gear.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not a very practical proposal. How do you know that something's going to annoy you until you've read it?NEILL THE NOTORIOUS wrote:The solution may well be, to avoid reading Posts which annoy you, or disagree, fundamentally, with your opinions.
I wouldn't describe anyone who has replied to you or commented upon your post as "sensitive" or "distraught". It's just that if you write things that could be construed as boastful, condescending or a tad sexist (at least to those whose attitudes have progressed beyond the 19th. Century) you're going to have to expect some reaction.NEILL THE NOTORIOUS wrote:Should Spoonbill, or others, be of such a sensitive nature that they are distraught abot this, I am sure that they may find consolation.
I remain un-repentant and NOTORIOUS------
I couldn't make the clapping hands smiley to work (again!) but - nice one, Richard!Richard Ruck wrote:I wouldn't describe anyone who has replied to you or commented upon your post as "sensitive" or "distraught". It's just that if you write things that could be construed as boastful, condescending or a tad sexist (at least to those whose attitudes have progressed beyond the 19th. Century) you're going to have to expect some reaction.NEILL THE NOTORIOUS wrote:Should Spoonbill, or others, be of such a sensitive nature that they are distraught abot this, I am sure that they may find consolation.
I remain un-repentant and NOTORIOUS------
anniexf wrote:Richard Ruck wrote:I wouldn't describe anyone who has replied to you or commented upon your post as "sensitive" or "distraught". It's just that if you write things that could be construed as boastful, condescending or a tad sexist (at least to those whose attitudes have progressed beyond the 19th. Century) you're going to have to expect some reaction.NEILL THE NOTORIOUS wrote:Should Spoonbill, or others, be of such a sensitive nature that they are distraught abot this, I am sure that they may find consolation.
I remain un-repentant and NOTORIOUS------
I couldn't make the clapping hands smiley to work (again!) but - nice one, Richard!
True - but the school's survival, unless it becomes just another public school, is highly correlated with the affluence of OBs and their ability to provide funding.sejintenej wrote:A somewhat different approach which, unfortunately, was not available when I was young. Define the final outcome and then decide what career will get you there.g
http://chforum.info/php/viewtopic.php?f ... 35#p108235