Unofficial Christ's Hospital Forum

englishangel wrote:

sejintenej wrote:

Foureyes wrote:I have to admit that when I read the first lines of sejintenj's latest posting with the heading "Was CH Horsham Designed to be Gay?" followed by a quote "....absolutely ages since I have embedded two at the same time" I initially came to the wrong conclusion!

and that wasn't even intended that way. I'm doubled up - LAUGHING (not what you might think at this time in the morning) and I haven't got time for all this.

Just trying to work out how to find the time to go and see the floosy at Hertford Saturday (the dummy, you dummy - if she is still there after this.)

Definitely a double entendre I feel.

Good for you, Mary - I'm all for it !

Englishangel,
Do you realise that to refer to 'two in a bed' as a double entendre is, in and of itself, a double entendre?

That is exactly what I meant.

Englishangel,

englishangel wrote:That is exactly what I meant.

Excellent! Actually, what I wrote was meant to be light-hearted, but on rereading it, it sounds a bit patronising, whicvh I can
assure you it was not meant to be
:deadhorse: Sorry

Apology accepted

Thank you Spoonbill for making a dull afternoon a lot more entertaining.

And just to prove your point: http://www.geocities.com/devilantsrugby/indexENG.html

My pal (also called Jo) who is a sports physio was official physiotherapist three or four years ago for the Gay Rugby World Cup tournament.

It is time that this nonsensical thread is put bed(oh dear).

It is well known amongst all the pupils that CH is completely Gay but only inthe modern ,young people's use of the word.Perhaps Spoonbill is not familiar with the expression 'your pencil case is so Gay ' or' French is Gay' or even 'Latin is sooooooooo gay'.

If Spoonbill was not so up his own behind(in the absence of being interested in anyone elses behind ) he would have realised this before he began.

Spoonbill, you really are,like, so Gay. No,really you are.

Caustic, but witty - I like it, nastymum.

Unfortunately, it'll probably be another 6 months before spoonbill replies!

I can hardly wait...

Oh, the suspense !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'll reply for him then !

Just why where there no doors on some of the toilets ? Why no privacy in the bath in the lavends? Why huge showers?

And if you wanted to become a grecian or senior grecian the easiest way of getting there was to be " gay" and get caught! Strange indeed.

Clearly they thought that you were all so mature and comfortable with your sexuality that it wouldn't bother you. Shurley shome mishtake ..

White Flag wrote: Just why where there no doors on some of the toilets ? Why no privacy in the bath in the lavends? Why huge showers?

Isn't this an example of quite the opposite? Toilets with no doors means nothing "untoward" can happen in private, behind closed doors. Surely the thinking was that getting it all out in the open meant there was nothing to hide.

I think the doorless frame for the lav-end toilets was mainly used to do pull-ups.

And hey, what about those doorless, curtainless changing-cubicles at the old swimming pool?

I mean, if there's no door or curtain, why even have cubicles?

it all looks very fishy to me.