Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:05 pm
by jtaylor
J.R. wrote:Chavs getting p1ssed up on a Friday night and tearing chunks out of each other. Now, THAT'S offensive !
As long as it's out of themselves, and not other non-chav people, then let them carry on with it - they should get an honourary Darwin award for trying to imporve the gene-pool....
J

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:17 pm
by marty
jtaylor wrote:they should get an honourary Darwin award for trying to imporve the gene-pool....
J
Or even one for trying to IMPROVE the gene-pool, Julian. I'm sorry I must apologise - I'm sadly finding myself transforming into a pedant as I race uncontrollably towards 30. Please forgive me.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:06 pm
by Mid A 15
I can't see the problem in the privacy of her garden.

Why did he keep looking at her let alone film her?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:35 pm
by Great Plum
Good grief Laura, and I remember you as a perfectly innocent person! :shock: :lol:

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:33 pm
by Hendrik
J.R. wrote:Chavs getting p1ssed up on a Friday night and tearing chunks out of each other. Now, THAT'S offensive !
Indeed. And bl**dy scary if, like me, you've never so muched as punched someone. Me and my semi-conscious ex were caught between two rival hooligan "firms" on the main concourse of Victoria station. First the volley of bottles, then the charge with the smashed pieces to try and cut each others necks. I can safely say that's the most scared I've been in my life.
Mrs Fleming wouldn't even take it as an excuse for being late back to house... :cry:

on the nudity bit, shouldn't the bloke next door be appearing in the docks? confused. :?

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 6:32 pm
by Tim_MaA_MidB
That would be naked aggression.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:25 pm
by midget
Has she demanded that the videotape be destroyed?

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 9:50 am
by Euterpe13
alternatively, she could demand copyright and performing rights fees .... make a nice profit !

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 10:26 am
by englishangel
I think this is really interesting when I think of the lengths we used to go to at Hertford to make sure we were covered at all times.

A favourite bullying ploy was to pull back the curtains when someone was in the bath. (no showers and no doors)

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 4:40 pm
by midget
englishangel wrote:I think this is really interesting when I think of the lengths we used to go to at Hertford to make sure we were covered at all times.

A favourite bullying ploy was to pull back the curtains when someone was in the bath. (no showers and no doors)
Worse yet was lifting off the entire curtain/rail combo

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 5:07 pm
by J.R.
englishangel wrote:I think this is really interesting when I think of the lengths we used to go to at Hertford to make sure we were covered at all times.

A favourite bullying ploy was to pull back the curtains when someone was in the bath. (no showers and no doors)
You had curtains ???

Just two baths in each dorm. end at Horsham. Open for ALL to view !

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 9:40 pm
by englishangel
Yes, but boys do that stuff anyway. Look at the boys loos.


Not that I would know of course

Image

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 8:15 am
by Tim_MaA_MidB
englishangel wrote:Look at the boys loos.
I'd rather not!

Had to look at them rather too closely when being "christened" back in the ole days!

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:32 pm
by Ruthie-Baby(old a/c)
Not on bullying or boys' toilets precisely, but we all know nudity is good. Maybe we should blame the catholic church - it was them that said that sex and nudity were bad...?

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:17 am
by englishangel
Ruthie-Baby wrote:Not on bullying or boys' toilets precisely, but we all know nudity is good. Maybe we should blame the catholic church - it was them that said that sex and nudity were bad...?
Only outside wedlock, they are at it like rabbits once they are married.

Many surveys have shown that married Christians have the most satisfying sex lives.