Angela Woodford wrote:Also the risk of infections. The stupid ignorant woman! It seems incredible that DR should have appointed such women to look after us. but I feel that 5's were particularly unfortunate in having that Housemistress, and I think she didn't stay long? I hope not, anyway!
Hi Munch
Was DR solely responsible for staff appointments?
My feelings towards DR changed after having read 'Half To Remember', or rather, my hope that she was acting out of what she perceived to be our best interest rather than malice were semi-confirmed.
IMO she had no idea of what were our best interests, our needs, or how we should have been cared for. I must admit to being slightly more grateful for having The Pot as a House Mistress after hearing Jo and Kay's stories, but spent over four years at CH hoping that someone of Mrs Blunt's personality and motherliness would once more take up residence in 6s.
I am absolutely outraged, and echo your comment about no-one complaining, but who would they have complained to? The Study? I can envisage Sarah T somehow smuggling supplies out to us. DR? Would she have intervened? Sister? I bl**dy well hope that she would have intervened, but suspect that she wouldn't have even bothered to let the complainants finish their story.
Kay, Jo, have you ever told this story to a Counsellor or Psychologist? I apologise for making the assumption that you, like many of the rest of us, have been counselled at some time. I wonder whether anyone who has not had the Hertford experience would even believe the story.
Two days??????????????? Two bl**dy (literally), smelly and potentially infectious bl**dy days. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.