Freedom Of Movement

Mid A 15 · Post by **Mid A 15** » Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:27 pm

Is it a right? Discuss.

http://www.abd.org.uk/index.htm

J.R. · Post by **J.R.** » Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:04 am

In what context, Mid A 15 ??

Mid A 15 · Post by **Mid A 15** » Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:15 am

J.R. wrote:In what context, Mid A 15 ??

A literal context. Should people have the right to move around as they please or do governments have a duty to create as much hassle as possible?

J.R. · Post by **J.R.** » Sat Feb 11, 2006 1:13 am

Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??

ben ashton · Post by **ben ashton** » Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:42 pm

The government's proposed linink of traffic/security cameras:
Dodgy. Would have to be very restricted access, and not sure about them including private cctv systems [eg. at petrol stations]

But, this is a good idea:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 75,00.html

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:26 pm

J.R. wrote:Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??

Woops! JR. Ready for another disagreement? This really smacks of BB

J.R. · Post by **J.R.** » Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:48 am

DavebytheSea wrote:
J.R. wrote:Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??
Woops! JR. Ready for another disagreement? This really smacks of BB

.............. Not when we see members of a certain religious persuasion turning up at demonstrations, all wired up with 'imitation' bomb equipment.

He should thank his lucky stars, (or crescents), he wasn't shot on sight !

midget · Post by **midget** » Sun Feb 12, 2006 3:33 pm

J.R. wrote:
DavebytheSea wrote:
J.R. wrote:Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??
Woops! JR. Ready for another disagreement? This really smacks of BB
.............. Not when we see members of a certain religious persuasion turning up at demonstrations, all wired up with 'imitation' bomb equipment.

He should thank his lucky stars, (or crescents), he wasn't shot on sight !

Hear Hear !!

Hendrik · Post by **Hendrik** » Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:31 am

With Civil Libs, there's rarely an easy answer.

consider this though: if the guy with imitation bombs strapped to him really was considered a threat, he would have been shot dead there and then.
the fact that he wasn't, means that he wasn't.
which makes it a bit rich to then go on and use him as an excuse for Orwellian levels of control.

the guy was, undoubtedly, a bit of a wâ‚¬nker. this speaks for itself, i really doubt he has many friends now (if he did before)